April 3, 2010

0 ATK VS 0 ATK

If monsters dont deal battle damage to each other, they cannot be destroyed by battle, so ramming a 0 ATK into another 0 ATK wont kill either monster.

/ラウゼス

6 comments:

  1. But it's different in TCG because the rulebook said so.

    I'm kinda hate it when they have different ruling in TCG and OCG :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah, in TCG, 0 ATK vs 0 ATK = both die.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That OCG ruling never made much sense to be since technically if a 2100 ATK monster attacked another 2100 ATK monster, neither would inflict damage to each other.

    ReplyDelete
  4. a 2100 attack against another 2100 attack both do 2100 attack to each other and perish.

    A 0 attack vs. a 0 attack does... 0 to each other... which isn't damage, thus neither should die.

    However, in place of logic we have a rulebook in tcg that says they both die.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is now ruled that 0 atk vs 0 atk will not destroy each other by battle (in TCG)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well, apparently, there was no change in ruling, so 0 atk vs 0 atk will still destroy each other

    ReplyDelete