April 3, 2010

0 ATK VS 0 ATK

If monsters dont deal battle damage to each other, they cannot be destroyed by battle, so ramming a 0 ATK into another 0 ATK wont kill either monster.

/ラウゼス
Posted by at

6 comments:

  1. AnonymousApril 4, 2010 at 7:26 PM

    But it's different in TCG because the rulebook said so.

    I'm kinda hate it when they have different ruling in TCG and OCG :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousApril 5, 2010 at 5:03 PM

    Yeah, in TCG, 0 ATK vs 0 ATK = both die.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousApril 5, 2010 at 11:09 PM

    That OCG ruling never made much sense to be since technically if a 2100 ATK monster attacked another 2100 ATK monster, neither would inflict damage to each other.

    ReplyDelete
  4. KaiApril 8, 2010 at 9:33 AM

    a 2100 attack against another 2100 attack both do 2100 attack to each other and perish.

    A 0 attack vs. a 0 attack does... 0 to each other... which isn't damage, thus neither should die.

    However, in place of logic we have a rulebook in tcg that says they both die.

    ReplyDelete
  5. KeyOctober 30, 2010 at 9:08 AM

    It is now ruled that 0 atk vs 0 atk will not destroy each other by battle (in TCG)

    ReplyDelete
  6. KeyDecember 12, 2010 at 10:56 AM

    Well, apparently, there was no change in ruling, so 0 atk vs 0 atk will still destroy each other

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)